New Face of FDOT Officially Anti-Bike Funding

The Florida Department of Transportation isn’t just anti-bicycling and walking road safety programs in Florida, they are against funding them anywhere.

On March 14, just days after bicycling advocates went to Congress asking them to not cut funding for bicycling programs (Bike Coalition Director and members among over 20 others from Florida, 600 countrywide) the State of Florida sent its own representative to tell Congress to do just the opposite.

Ananth Prasad, FDOT

Mr. Ananth Prasad is one of the three candidates up for Governor Rick Scott’s consideration as the new State Secretary for the Florida Department of Transportation. He currently holds the title of Assistant Secretary for Engineering & Operations, making him the only ‘in-house’ option. (The other two are Gordon Goodin, owner of Bayside Development, and Thomas Conrecode, VP at Collier Enterprise).

Mr. Prasad spoke on behalf of FDOT/ Governor Scott’s interests at a special hearing before the United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The Committee, chaired by Florida’s own Rep. John Mica, is drafting a new transportation bill and thus seeking input from stakeholders across the country. What did our own FDOT representative say? Read the full text of his speech here[PDF].

Some of the items Prasad touched on were clearly positive for Florida, such as his request for more transportation money for Florida, a ‘donor’ state that sends out more gas tax money than it gets back from the federal government. He called for increased investment in public-private partnerships , citing the I-595 Express project and the Port of Miami Tunnel as examples. While that may support Rick Scott’s call for more private sector jobs, there was no mention of the innovative public-private partnerships that would have come about from High Speed Rail or bikeshare.

Other requests clearly reflected Governor Scott’s agenda. Prasad supported Scott’s push for fewer regulations by calling for removal of some regulations that he called unnecessary for Florida and by requesting that states be allowed to skip the federal environmental review process and substitute their own. In the midst of calling for a reduction in the number of federal transportation programs, Prasad proclaimed:

We must give serious consideration to whether—when resources and dollars are at a premium—spending money on sidewalks, bike trails, beautification, and other projects like this is the most prudent use of taxpayer money.

Wow. Forget about the “Complete Streets” mandate embedded in Florida Statute that FDOT has to include pedestrian and bicycle facilities into their projects. Nevermind that new bicycling facilities create twice as many jobs as standard road repair work and make streets safer for ALL road users.The way to fuel the economy, according to FDOT, is to move cars faster:

“The faster we can move people and goods to their destination, the faster our economy will grow … We must be viligent to ensure that we invest only where taxpayers’ money will be put to use on critically-needed projects that will ultimately grow our economy.”

Prasad’s message is clear: Times are tough, so let’s forget about multimodal transportation and focus on automobile capacity. Congress needs to be reminded that as gas prices head toward $4 for the second time in three years, more people are choosing to bike or walk. This makes it critical to invest transportation dollars in safer roads for everyone, rather than just faster highways. (You will remember that FDOT considers Miami’s densest residential street and it’s busiest downtown avenue, highways.)

Florida: we cannot build our way out of congestion. We need a versatile transportation system that embraces intercity rail, urban transit, bicycling, and walking as well as the currently privileged modes.

If we can put aside the political agendas and focus on effective investment, we would see that non-highway options, like high speed rail and bikeshare, provide what Prasad says DOTs want: public-private partnerships. The Tampa-Orlando high speed rail was expected to turn a $10.2 million profit, a lucrative opportunity for private investment in infrastructure. DecoBike, a private enterprise which seems to have gotten off to a good start, has not cost the city of Miami Beach a dime and is even sharing revenue with them. B-Cycle‘s proposed system for Broward County won’t cost taxpayers any money once it’s up and running, and their business model depends on turning a profit from the system as well. FDOT is already involved in this public-private partnership, fronting the capital through a grant to the county, then leaving the private vendor to run the system. Florida can support systems such as these by providing both capital investment to get the systems started and by providing proper infrastructure to encourage more system users. Check out the Sun-Sentinel article for more details on both programs.


Your Members of Congress, Governor Scott, FDOT need to hear from you that you want cost-effective solutions to Florida’s #1 ranking as the Country’s most dangerous place to walk or ride a bicycle.

Also: Please take a moment to contact Rep. Mica — his staff on transportation — or his office via phone at (202) 225-4035. Let him know that you want Complete Streets in the next transportation bill and that you support federal mandates that ensure investments in our roads will make them safer and better for EVERYone, whether they travel by bicycle, train, bus, car, truck or on foot.


This will be a cross-post with our member blog,

About Kathryn Moore / South Florida Bike Coalition

I'm the President of the South Florida Bike Coalition - a 100% volunteer organization of people dedicated to using their skills and experience to effect more, better bicycling from the Keys to Martin County.

7 thoughts on “New Face of FDOT Officially Anti-Bike Funding

  1. Pingback: Florida DOT: ‘Don’t Build Sidewalks When Economy is Down’ | Transit Miami

  2. I am going to contact our state politicians. Unfortunately, Gov. Scott does not listen or care about Florida residents. He only cares about big business. It is a shame, so much has been accomplished in making our city and state more bicycle friendly in the past fews years and it is all going to come to grinding halt.

  3. Mr. Prasad was the “Hearing Officer” at the A1A bike lane hearing back in 2006. It was great that an engineer was deciding issues of law. He “agreed” that the costs of putting in an extra few feet of pavement was disproportionate to the “need” or “demand”. Also, regarding the fact that Florida is a “sending state” when it comes to gas tax dollars, South Florida is a “sending region” within Florida when it comes to in-state tax dollars. Again, nice that some bureaucrat from Tallahassee was making a decision on how to send our locally generated tax dollars on our locally used roads.

  4. It is stunning that despite the fact that the top four most dangerous cities for pedestrians are all in Florida that a scientist could overlook our “need”.

    The needs of our biggest most mature urban areas (very big donors tax wise because of their population density) have different needs from most of sprawled our Florida. For dense urban areas like Miami and St. Pete and to a lesser degree Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville to compete, they need bike/ped/transit infrastructure. Once density reaches a certain tipping point the automobile is no longer the most efficient way for moving people from place to place. And if we can get individuals off the roads in dense areas, there is more opportunity for efficient motor vehicle distribution of good and services.

    I wonder how Mr. Prasad and Mr. Scott would have taken Paul Steely White’s compelling economic argument – that commercial rents have more than doubled in areas of New York City where major bike/ped improvements have been made and portions of the street have been reallocated from motorists back to bicyclists and walkers.

  5. The FDOT has proven to be productive at two things:
    1. Creating roadway designs responsible for creating the four most dangerous cities for pedestrians and cyclists in in the USA.
    2. Killing neighbhoods and communities (or never allowing them to being) by roadway design that treats anyone not in motorized vehicles as unworthy of the road, and failing to create vibrant streetscapes that allows local business to flourish.

    Enter Mr. Prasad. Instead of recognizing these failures, he simply regurgitates the same failed policy drumbeat we’ve been hearing for years. Define ‘insanity’ – Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Wake up FDOT.

  6. Pingback: Speak Up for People Who Bike, Walk « South Florida Bike Coalition

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s